Prediction of Peter Doohan vs Tony Mmoh Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Doohan vs T. Mmoh

Peter Doohan

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

105

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Tony Mmoh

NGR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

105

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Doohan 1 - 0 Mmoh

They have played 2 sets in total, with Peter Doohan winning 2 and Tony Mmoh winning 0. The last match between Peter Doohan and Tony Mmoh was at the Sydney Outdoor, 26-01-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Peter Doohan getting the victory 6-1 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Doohan	1
Mmoh	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Sydney Outdoor(01-26-87)

Stats

Peter Doohan

Tony Mmoh

P. Doohan vs T. Mmoh H2H Profile

P. Doohan	Stats	T. Mmoh
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.77% (99-104)	Career Total W/L	48.78% (60-63)
1	Grass	0
3	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Doohan vs T. Mmoh Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peter Doohan has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tony Mmoh has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peter Doohan, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tony Mmoh has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Peter Doohan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tony Mmoh has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Peter Doohan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tony Mmoh winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Peter Doohan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Tony Mmoh has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 17/15), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
Player level: In the last year, Peter Doohan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tony Mmoh has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peter Doohan winning 1 times and Tony Mmoh being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peter Doohan winning 2 and Tony Mmoh winning 0.
The last match between Peter Doohan and Tony Mmoh was at the Sydney Outdoor, 26-01-1987, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Peter Doohan getting the victory 6-1 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peter Doohan has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tony Mmoh has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peter Doohan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tony Mmoh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Peter Doohan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tony Mmoh has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Peter Doohan vs Tony Mmoh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Doohan vs T. Mmoh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Doohan	Stats	T. Mmoh
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Doohan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 10-02-1992
R1 Kevin CurrenK. Curren	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
Australian Open - 14-01-1991
R1 Richard FrombergR. Fromberg	L	6-4 7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Brisbane - 24-09-1990
R1 Brad GilbertB. Gilbert	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Australian Open - 15-01-1990
R1 Michael StichM. Stich	L	6-3 6-2 6-2	Stats
Brisbane - 02-10-1989
R3 Darren CahillD. Cahill	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Mmoh Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Seoul Olympics - 20-09-1988
R3 Michiel SchapersM. Schapers	L	4-6 6-3 6-1 4-6 6-1	Stats
R2 Wojtek KowalskiW. Kowalski	W	6-2 6-4 6-4	Stats
Schenectady - 18-07-1988
R3 Patrick McEnroeP. McEnroe	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Boston - 04-07-1988
R2 Peter PalandjianP. Palandjian	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Davis Cup G1 SF: AUT vs NGR - 10-06-1988
Robin Thomas MusterT. Muster	L	6-2 6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Doohan vs T. Mmoh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Doohan	Stats	T. Mmoh
48.77% (99/104)	YTD Win/Loss	48.78% (60/63)
48.10% (240/259)	Sets Win/Loss	50.33% (152/150)
49.74% (2395/2420)	Games Win/Loss	49.84% (1430/1439)
40.51% (32/47)	Hard Win/Loss	51.32% (39/37)
61.76% (21/13)	Clay Win/Loss	53.13% (17/15)
45.45% (5/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (4/6)
51.90% (41/38)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/5)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
424.28	Average Opponent Rank	460.99
34.48% (10/19)	Slam W/L	33.33% (2/4)
16.67% (1/5)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/2)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	78.57% (11/3)
40.21% (39/58)	Main Tour W/L	24.00% (6/19)
69.01% (49/22)	Challenger W/L	54.05% (40/34)
52% (88/170)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	48% (50/105)
33% (10/30)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	56% (10/18)
0% (0/1)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
49% (28/57)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (15/31)
85% (98/83)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (61/49)
15% (98/15)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (61/12)
15% (105/16)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (62/11)